An introduction to assessing the financial strength of banks

QuietGrowth - An introduction to assessing the financial strength of banks

Banks are measured for financial strength through various metrics and ratios that assess their overall financial health and ability to withstand stress. Some of the key measures used to evaluate banks include:

  • Capital adequacy: This measures a bank’s ability to absorb losses and maintain its operations in the event of financial stress. Regulators typically require banks to maintain minimum capital levels based on the risk of their assets. Capital adequacy ratios measure the amount of capital a bank holds in relation to its risk-weighted assets (RWAs). The most commonly used capital adequacy ratios include the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio, and the Total Capital ratio.
  • Asset quality: This measures the quality of a bank’s assets, including its loan portfolio, and its ability to manage credit risk. Banks with a high proportion of non-performing loans or other risky assets are considered to have lower financial strength. Key measures of asset quality include non-performing loans (NPLs), loan loss provisions, and loan loss reserves.
  • Liquidity: This measures a bank’s ability to meet its financial obligations as they come due, including deposit withdrawals and other funding needs. Liquidity ratios measure a bank’s ability to meet its short-term obligations. The most commonly used liquidity ratios include the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR).
  • Profitability: This measures a bank’s ability to generate profits from its operations, which is important for maintaining capital levels and investing in growth. Key profitability measures include return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE).
  • Efficiency: This measures a bank’s ability to manage its costs and operate efficiently, vital for maintaining profitability and competitiveness.
  • Leverage Ratio: This measures a bank’s Tier 1 capital against its total assets, providing a measure of a bank’s overall leverage and financial risk.
  • Stress Testing: This involves subjecting a bank’s balance sheet to various hypothetical scenarios, such as a severe economic downturn or a market shock, to assess its ability to withstand financial stress.
  • Risk management: This measures a bank’s ability to identify, measure, and manage various risks, including credit, market, liquidity, and operational risks.

Regulators and rating agencies use these and other measures to assess the financial strength of banks and assign ratings or other scores that indicate their overall level of risk. Investors, analysts, and other stakeholders also use these measures to evaluate banks and make investment decisions.

These measures, taken together, provide a comprehensive picture of a bank’s financial strength and ability to withstand financial stress. Banks must maintain certain minimum levels of capital and liquidity under regulatory guidelines. Still, many banks aim to maintain higher levels of capital and liquidity as a buffer against potential risks and losses.

Challenges regulators face while assessing the financial strength of banks

Regulators face several challenges when assessing the financial strength of banks, including:

  • Complexity: Banks have become increasingly complex over time, with a wide range of financial products and services that can make it difficult for regulators to fully understand the risks that banks are taking on. This is particularly true of large, multinational banks that operate in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Lack of understanding: Macroeconomics is complex with different schools of thought. It is an evolving research arena. The identification of specific dynamics as risks might not have happened due to this until the pain is felt at a later date.
  • Lack of transparency: Banks may not disclose to the regulators all the risks they take. This is usually because the banks themselves might not understand all the risks they are taking on.
  • Changing regulatory environment: The regulatory environment constantly evolves, with new rules and regulations being introduced regularly. This can make it difficult for regulators to keep up with the latest developments and ensure that banks comply with all relevant regulations.
  • Fear of repercussions: Regulators may be reluctant to take action that could harm the banking system or the broader economy.
  • Limited resources: Regulators may not have the resources they need to fully assess the financial strength of banks. This is particularly true in developing countries, where regulatory agencies may be understaffed or underfunded.

Overall, assessing the financial strength of banks is a complex and ongoing process, and regulators must remain vigilant to identify and address emerging risks in the banking system.

Related information

Refer to the related knowledge resources:

QuietGrowth has been publishing content in this blog or in other sections of the website. Contributors for this content may include the employees of QuietGrowth, or third-party firms, or third-party authors. Unless otherwise noted, such content does not necessarily represent the actual views or opinions of QuietGrowth or any of its employees, directors, or officers.

Any links provided in our website to other websites are for the purpose of convenience, or as required by any such other websites. Unless otherwise noted, this does not imply that QuietGrowth endorses, is affiliated, and/or promotes any information, or products or services of those websites. Please read the advice disclaimer section of the website too.

Get started. Start investing.

Select the type of investment account you want to create




Individual: A personal account for you to invest for yourself.
Joint: An account for you and another person to invest for both of you.
SMSF: An account for the trustees of a Self-Managed Super Fund to invest through it.
Trust: An account for the trustees of a trust to invest through it.
Let QuietGrowth manage your investments for you.